Impressions of Justice

So, this is the United States of America in 2018. This is the US government in 2018. Even if one believes Professor Ford and others fabricated their statements or had cases of mistaken identity, and even if one believes Judge Kavanaugh’s temperament is fine for the Supreme Court, this level of aggressive division across US government and culture is toxic.

It is impossible to achieve true justice without creating safe space for women. Despite what the President may suggest about this being a scary time for young men in America, it is a scarier time for young women in America, and it has been scarier for women for a long time. The fact that many elected officials do not see this gap between genders is the essence of male privilege. The United States is toxic right now, and I do not recognize it.

So, where do we go from here? Expanding on one of my recent Twitter posts, what’s the good, the bad, and the ugly?

The Good: one does not need to look very far to see that a movement for social justice and equality is picking up speed. If that movement can stay organized, keep the pressure for democratic principles up, and transition into getting the vote out over the next month (lots of states have early voting), all might not be in vain. What was partially good? We had an investigation…of sorts. Though some believe otherwise, I maintain that an investigation was necessary, and the fact that it happened after considerable pressure is a good thing. However, that investigation appears to be largely incomplete, called a sham by some. Witnesses were questioned – not enough – and more importantly, some accusers were not consulted. In this age of 24/7 media, it feels like more info came to light that didn’t make it onto the FBI report than whatever was actually included in that document. This flow of information, including leaks, continues to charge the growing social justice movement and influence the court of public opinion, firing up both supporters and the opposition. Election season is here, so it is critical to channel the energy of this movement out to constituents and mobilize the electorate. Raise your voices, but also get out and vote!

The bad: this investigation stunk of politics at best and smelled of a cover-up at worst. At face value it is hard to believe that anyone actually planned to reconsider their vote based on the report, and amazingly, historic protests also did not ultimately have political pull. Would anything have changed minds, or was this all political theater?

The ugly: both parties are competing dumpster fires. The vitriol is at new heights, and one could easily compile hours of shameful soundbites, spoken especially by members of the Republican Party, but the Democrats also had their less-than-stellar moments. The haste by Republican leadership to call a vote despite all this drama and uncertainty and the rush to finish despite the visible pain being felt by sexual assault survivors across the country further suggests that this was government working above, not for, the people. Even now, it is starting to feel as if government is afraid of some of the people it is charged to serve.

The Democratic Party also missed an opportunity here. As Professor Ford’s accusation and the other accusations unfolded, the story of Judge Kavanaugh began to sound more like a criminal trial than a confirmation hearing (essentially a job interview). Some democrats accepted that frame and probably should not have, for it opened up a door to others suggesting the party was flipping a cornerstone of justice and presuming guilt rather than innocence. Determining whether or not Kavanaugh committed sexual assault was only part of the issue. The main issue before the Senate was whether he is fit for a lifetime position on the Supreme Court.

Somewhere in the last few weeks this became only about guilt or innocence and not about character, and in this, the United States stepped further down a divisive path that could easily take a generation or more to truly heal. The US is no longer a safe place for women, for Congress has silenced their voices in the most callous fashion. Even if you don’t believe the accusers, the optics of women across the country coming forward to the people elected to represent them, only to be given the cold shoulder or told to grow up is deeply concerning. When half the population doesn’t feel safe or heard or equal, none of us are truly free.

I weep for the end of democracy in America. Some might think this is hyperbole, but let me put it this way: a man with multiple accusations hanging over him and extreme views on many of the most important issues of the day – specifically issues that impact women and minorities, working people, and all of us when it comes to health care and executive power – is now sitting on the bench of the highest court in the land, set to start work on Tuesday. This is a man who also demonstrated considerable anger during his hearing. And even with all we know about him, there is so much more that was never disclosed. We will learn more about Justice Kavanaugh in the coming months and years, but that knowledge will only come through the ways he further shapes this country from the bench, not from the true bipartisan vetting expected during the confirmation process.

Does that sound democratic to you?

But there might be hope. Keep in mind that Kavanaugh was nominated by a President who did not win the popular vote. The 49 Senators who voted ‘No’ represent a little over 180 million people. The 51 Senators who voted ‘Yes’ represent less than 150 million people. How’s the electoral college working for you? It’s time to transform it. But first, we must vote. We must all vote.

Rest in peace, Democracy. Perhaps we can still resuscitate you. As Benjamin Franklin replied when asked if we had a republic or a monarchy, “a republic, if you can keep it.”  Can we?

Posted in Activism, Community | Leave a comment

Bearing witness

Hello friends, family, and followers of this blog. I am rekindling it in light of recent events. I think it goes without say that the United States of America is in crisis. Specifically, its democracy is in crisis, and these concerns are non-partisan because ultimately we all live with the consequences of our actions as well as the consequences of the actions of those around us. More importantly, we all live with the consequences of the actions of those in power. Through this blog, I am bearing witness to these events as my civic duty.

The Kavanaugh investigation to unfold in the coming week must be thorough, professional, and non-partisan. Do I think it will be? Based on the past few weeks, sadly no. But one can hope, and one can and must take action.

Regardless of what happens this week, I want you all to know that this blog (and of course me) is a safe space. We will need safe spaces regardless of the outcome here, for massive damage to our democracy has already occurred.

Whether you think Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh are the truth or not, there is a much greater, long-term issue here: the future safety of women and a strong pronouncement that their voices matter. As of right now, the United States does not appear to be a nation that respects women…at all. At a minimum, this investigation must demonstrate that these allegations are taken seriously and deserve the attention necessary for any life-time appointment. If there is any doubt in the integrity of the investigation, we all lose, our democracy dies, and the United States will join the ranks of nations whose disrespect of human rights it once opposed.

Onward.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Activism, Community | Leave a comment

Refugees 101

One of my friends who works extensively with refugees recently outlined the background check process. This info is also available on the State Department website. In the spirit of this blog, I hope to cultivate bridges through transparent, non-partisan information. Understanding how things work is step one:

First a refugee must register as a refugee seeking resettlement. This is done through the UNHCR (United Nations High Commission on Refugees). They collect preliminary data on the refugee: name, age, place of origin, religion, flight story (why they left), and family members, as well as fingerprints. This information is then sent to the Refugee Support Center (RSC). This center is funded by the State Department. RSC conducts a lengthy investigation into the refugee. This includes multiple interviews by someone from the RSC. The information is also put into a database that is cross referenced to make sure the refugee is not already registered (if they left one refugee camp and went to another). The info is then sent to the US for a background check.

There are multiple agencies that participate in the background check:  the National Counterterrorism Center, FBI, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Department of Defense, and the Department of State, as well as the intelligence community. All of their data is sent back to the RSC. The background check checks for security threats, including connections to “bad actors” or people that wish our country harm, or those associated with people that wish us harm, and past immigration or criminal violations. For Syrian applicants, DHS conducts an additional enhanced review. Refugees are screened more carefully than any other type of traveler to the U.S. All of this info is then sent back to DHS where people who are trained to look into immigration affairs further investigate the candidate. They also do in-country interviews with the applicant and run his/her fingerprints again. The interview and fingerprint info is checked against data collected at the start of this process to make sure everything is still the same. If new information pops up, for example if a known relative is registered in the camp during the process, it will be halted while a background check is done on the relative to make sure no concerning information pops up about the relative. If at any point inconsistencies are found, the process is halted and the applicant is not allowed to resettle in the U.S. If everything checks out the applicant is, again, fingerprinted and rechecked. The prints are checked against the following systems: The FBI biometric database, the DHS biometric database, which includes watch-list information and previous immigration encounters in the U.S. and overseas, and the U.S. Department of Defense database, which includes fingerprints obtained around the world. Again, if inconsistencies or problematic results come back, the process is stopped and the applicant is denied resettlement. If not, the applicant goes onto cultural orientation (about America) and a medical check. Again, if all is well, the applicant is then referred to resettlement partners in America who then resettle them in America.

The US has been resettling refugees since 1975. Since 9/11 the US has resettled roughly 75,000 refugees.  About half of refugees that apply for resettlement in the U.S. are allowed to resettle here, and only about 2% are of “combat age”. About half the refugees admitted are children, and 25% are over the age of 60. Refugees are “loaned” the money to fly here, and after one year in the U.S. they must start paying the US government back for their airfare. The whole process from registration to setting foot on U.S. soil takes about 2 years.

Posted in Community, Education, Stewardship | Leave a comment

Be Radically Curious

At a recent holiday party, a friend described today’s mood as one where it is vital to be radically curious. There are so many unknowns, so many possible ways for events to unfold, so many different roles to play and choices to make.

I like this phrase, “radically curious,” because it speaks to the best of the human condition and is universal. One can be radically curious about almost anything — art, politics, literature, music, food, sports, mechanics, energy, water, culture, relationships… you name it. In a world of sound bites, perhaps we have lost some of that impulse to seek out the truth in stories for ourselves.

So stay curious. Stay radically curious. And follow that curiosity wherever it leads you.

Posted in Community, Stewardship | Leave a comment

Nothing comes from nothing

It has been far too long since I’ve written in this space.  Granted, a lot happened in the past ten months, but the events of the last few weeks demonstrate that history is at a crossroads. We are more globally connected than ever before, and yet the cultural divides seem to be growing deeper. Fear is a powerful emotion, but love is stronger. I do believe that justice marches only forward, slowly, but it does not march passively. The beauty is in how the actions of a few, over time, can be the difference between justice and injustice.

On this MLK Day of 2016, I am reinvigorating this blog. Silence does not breed justice, and as forces try to isolate groups from each other, it is more important than ever to cultivate bridges.  In my travels, I have found more often than not that people are people. While we have differences, we share more in common than the modern newsreel would indicate. The best antidote to fear and terror is conversation. I do believe that as long as parties continue to talk with one another, and as long as we are joined globally, love will prevail. But it will not happen through inaction.

Posted in Activism, Community | 1 Comment

The Human Toll of an Anemic Recovery

Late last week, a friend shared with me an article from the Seattle Weekly, “A Letter to the Investor Buying Our Apartment Building.” Sadly, this emotionally charged piece is a common story, although it is a story rarely told. Our lopsided economic “recovery,” – a recovery for only the very few – has a human toll. Some have paid by being forced to move, many have paid by downsizing and rewriting their hopes and dreams, and some, as was the case for William (Bill) McHalffey, pay with their lives. Opportunities for even the most modest forms of dignity when a person falls on tough times are drying up, while life for the educated, tech-savvy, and asset and income wealthy continues to improve. In a place like Seattle and much of the rest of the country, there is a disappearing middle class.  Population growth is occurring mostly among the affluent and the poor, setting the stage for future instability and conflict.

Seattle is not alone in having a housing crisis, but perhaps what is most shocking about this form of inequity is the level of disagreement over the sense of urgency, who should take responsibility, and even some denial as to whether a problem exists at all. For a city that prides itself on social justice, one would think that the abundance of cranes on the horizon is a sign that at least some of the dwellings going up are affordably priced. While some are, most are not, and Seattle Mayor, Ed Murray’s demand that 20,000 of the needed 50,000 dwellings to be built over the next decade be priced affordably is a bold statement. Government and the non-profit sector cannot build 20,000 affordable homes on their own. By putting forth this number, Mayor Murray is saying that for-profit builders, developers, and investors are part of the solution, too. They have to be. The need is just that great.

The empirical evidence in the Seattle Weekly letter demonstrates what housing advocates have been saying for years – every resource is stretched to the breaking point, and when an investor purchases a building for profit, someone like Bill runs out of options. When there is nowhere else to go but the street, and the street means almost certain suffering and death, what do you do?

But I’m not here to talk just about people like Bill. I’m here to talk about everyone because in many ways the biggest tragedy of our anemic recovery is that too many of us are seeking ways to take ourselves out of the equation and put the blame on someone else. This makes sense because taking responsibility for a problem so seemingly insurmountable is tough. It is human nature to try to find someone else to provide the solution. However, the belief that larger government and non-profit organizations can solve this crisis is flawed, as is the belief that deficit reduction will lead to more growth or that tax cuts for the wealthy will trickle down. Poverty reduction is a growth industry, yet we are treating it as something to be relegated to philanthropy and charity. I believe that the answer lies in a balanced approach, where businesses recognize the value of investing in all people and communities, and government serves as a responsible backstop and policy framework that encourages the scaling of socially, economically, and environmentally mindful ventures.  The role of the people in this is to act as conscientious consumers, humane and respectful citizens, and neighborhood stewards.

Having lived in places with higher levels of inequality than the US, I can assure you that an increasingly inequitable America will be an insecure place to be even for those fortunate to have access to resources. Inequality leads to the erosion of a tax base, political turmoil, and social unrest. Highly inequitable places have gates around single family homes, even in quiet residential neighborhoods, and violent crimes occur with regularity. Sadly, those gates have already started going up in many of our communities.

The US is at a pivotal point, and we all need to choose between a policy of austere Social Darwin capitalism or a more humane form of social capitalism with a responsive and agile safety net. A wonderful survey of research from The Atlantic, “Welfare Makes America More Entrepreneurial,” challenges conventional wisdom on both sides of the political aisle, making a strong case that a resurgence of entrepreneurship is vital for a truly diverse economic recovery. Policies of austerity often result in curbing the ability for people to take calculated risks. When the American Dream becomes simply putting food on the table and keeping enough of an emergency fund to weather bad times, we all lose. It despairs me to think what potential opportunities for innovation have been thrown under the bus because their future inventor is too busy focusing on just getting by. A safety net benefits everyone.

Which brings me back to investors, builders, and developers. In planning for more equitable communities, we must not demonize people and institutions focused on making profits. To do so would be a zero sum game. If anything, we should invite them, and everyone else, to the table. Equitable communities involve all of us, and the challenges are substantial. We will likely need to rethink zoning, property ownership, financial tools, investment, construction, and even the very nature of what it means to have a home. Our current paradigm is broken and needs an overhaul. We can either work together on this or be torn apart by it.

My hope and dream as it always has been on this blog is to start from the most basic. Let’s talk with each other, not at each other.

Posted in Activism, Community, Stewardship | Leave a comment

On Breathing

The words I Can’t Breathe seem quite simple on the surface. Who could have predicted that these words would come to define a moment, perhaps a movement, to close out the year 2014? Anyone who has ever struggled to breathe, nearly drowned or choked or lives with asthma, knows that this phrase is anything but simple. It’s an expression of a struggle.

I’m usually a very jolly person in December, despite the darkness and the cold, despite the deadlines that come with the turn of a calendar page. This season of giving feels different. Growing pains are preventing us from breathing collectively in peace and harmony.

When I played music to the tune of rehearsals three out of the seven nights of the week, or when I ran cross county and track and field breathing meant the difference between success and failure. One can’t do much of anything without deep breaths of fresh, clean, strength-giving  air. It calms the nerves, centers the energy, and keeps us at an even keel.

Our society is struggling to breathe because not everyone is free. Potential and opportunity are measured by zip code and class, and the dreams are squashed far too early for far too many people. When the dream becomes not a yearning for success but a struggle for survival we all lose.

However, in this season of giving, I do believe in hope.  #ICantBreathe represents an awakening. It might be a tall order for everyone to get along, but #ICantBreathe is about giving everyone a fair chance. Breathing as a society means recognizing in our bones that we are all on this rock hurtling through space together. We might not always agree, but none of us have the right to stand in the way of another’s potential.

Please share if you believe #ICantBreathe can and should become the closing chapter on centuries of class and racial oppression and the beginning of a more harmonious, just world.  Please share if you’d like to see #ICantBreathe represent constructive change for the better.  I, for one, believe humans are still capable of empathy and compassion.  It is what gives us souls.

Season’s Greetings, each and every one.

Posted in Community | Tagged | Leave a comment